MUH 3997: Music Senior Seminar
| COURSE REQUIREMENTS |
| 1. Attendance at all sessions: On Time |
| 2. Presentation of preliminary bibliography |
| 3. Presentation of assigned works in class (see rubric for presentations below) |
| 4. Satisfactory completion of 3 Comprehensive Examinations with minimum grade of C |
COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS
| Date | Topic |
| 8/27 | Course Requirements and Schedule of Presentations |
| 9/3 | Presentations and Discussions: 1-3 |
| 9/10 | Presentations and Discussions: 4-6; Introduction to Music management |
| 9/17 | Presentations and Discussions: 7-9 |
| 9/24 | Presentations and Discussions: 10-12; Publishing and Copyright |
| 10/1 | Presentations and Discussions: 13-15 |
| 10/8 | Presentations and Discussions: 16-18; Recording and Broadcast Industry |
| 10/15 | Presentations and Discussions: 19-21 |
| 10/22 | Presentations and Discussions: 22-24; Contracts and Legal Issues |
| 10/29 | Research and Study |
| 11/5 | Senior Comprehensive Exam I - Listening and Score Identification |
| 11/12 | Research and Study |
| 11/19 | Senior Comprehensive Exam II - Essays on Specific Areas |
| 11/26 | Thanksgiving: Research and Turkey |
| 12/3 | Senior Comprehensive Exam III - Analysis of Selected Works |
ASSIGNED TOPICS FOR MUSIC MANAGEMENT:
Music Management study materials should be drawn from the four required MuMG courses: Introduction to Music Business: an Overview, The Recording and Broadcast Industries, Music Publishing and the Copyright Law, and Contracts and Legal Issues for the Music Business. Questions will be drawn from subject matter covered in these classes and will be presented as a series of business tasks.
Music Management Materials:
Introduction to Music Management
Publishing and Copyright Law
Recording and Broadcast Industry
Contracts and Legal Issues
Site accessed
times since 4/21/2008
All course materials are available on line on reserve. Through the semester, students will build the site by adding bibliographies, presentation outlines and PowerPoint presentations to this Manhattanville Blackboard Site and each student will be responsible for presenting one piece to the seminar. You should study the historical, theoretical and bibliographical information about these works. This includes putting each work into the context of other pieces of the same genre or era, and you will be responsible for identifying works by listening and by looking at a score.
The Examinations will take place on three Wednesdays as indicated on the syllabus above. Also, each student will be responsible for the bibliography for their piece on the list. This word processed bibliography will be posted on line and should include the major books and articles dealing with each work, including encyclopedia articles in The New Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians and any scores or recordings used to prepare for the examination. The list of sources indicates the level of preparation for the examination and should include journal articles relevant to each work. The bibliography must follow a standard music format.
The guide for correct bibliography is: Mark A. Radice. Irvine's Writing About Music. (Portland, OR, 1999). All bibliography must conform to the guidelines in the text.
Useful Online Bibliography Reference: Towson University has an online guide in the style of Irvine's Writing about Music, which can be accessed here.
Learning Objectives: MUH 3997: Music Senior Seminar explores the historical repertoire of art music of Europe and the United States and reviews the basic constructs and principles of Music Management. This capstone course will bring into play the following Music Department Learning Objectives:
Objective II: Critical Thinking and Aural Analysis
- By learning to examine pieces within specific historical and cultural contexts, and learning to ask questions about the style, context, and function for historical understanding, performance or transmission of ideas to others.
- By developing the ability to compare and contrast major works in history of music.
Objective III: Breadth of Knowledge
- By demonstrating broad, generalized knowledge of repertoire, formal procedures, and chronology of style.
- By investigating a deeper knowledge base in specialized fields; developing tools for building advanced levels of knowledge.
- Identify specialized areas of the music industry, including the recording and broadcast industries, music publishing, copyright law, and legal issues.
Objective IV: Information Retrieval and Literacy
- By learning to locate and retrieve information from a variety of sources, both primary and secondary.
By learning to evaluate information and its sources critically.
Objective V: Analytic and Research Writing Skills
By learning to identify and cite sources properly, and to understand the standards of integrity in the pursuit of academic work.
- By learning to write effective comparative essays, including discussions of style, image function, and historical context.
Rubric for Grading a Presentation in Senior Seminar*
*Adapted from models at Utah Education Network
|
|
Unsatisfactory - D |
Satisfactory - C |
Good - B |
Excellent - A |
Grading |
|
Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed. |
Some subject knowledge is evident. Some Information is confusing or incorrect. |
Subject knowledge is evident. Most information is clear, appropriate, and correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident and thorough. All information is clear, correct, and appropriate. |
/32 |
|
Citing Sources |
No sources are properly cited. |
Few sources are properly cited. |
All sources are well chosen and properly cited. |
Excellent sources are well chosen and properly cited. |
/24 |
|
Organization |
The sequence of information is not logical. Reference to further information is not evident. |
The sequence of information is somewhat logical. Minimal further information is available. |
The sequence of information is clear. Meaningful further research is referenced. |
All presented information is logical and intuitive. Suggestions of further research are clear and direct. |
/24 |
|
Originality |
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is no evidence of new thought. |
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is little evidence of new thought or inventiveness. |
The presentation shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness. |
Most content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, and inventive. |
/10 |
|
Technical |
PowerPoint runs adequately and spoken text is coordinated. |
PowerPoint runs well and spoken text adds additional detail to slides. |
PowerPoint runs well and both spoken text and handout add significant detail. |
PowerPoint, spoken text and handout are well coordinated and contain rich details. |
/10 |
|
Evaluation: /100 |
|||||