Professor Carmelo Comberiati
Music Department
Email: comberiatic@mville.edu
Web Page: http://faculty.mville.edu/comberiatic
Phone: (914) 323-5252
Music Building, Room 114
Fall, 2008

MUH 3997: Music Senior Seminar

COURSE REQUIREMENTS
1. Attendance at all sessions: On Time
2. Presentation of preliminary bibliography
3. Presentation of assigned works in class (see rubric for presentations below)
4. Satisfactory completion of 3 Comprehensive Examinations with minimum grade of C

COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

Date Topic
8/27 Course Requirements and Schedule of Presentations
9/3 Presentations and Discussions: 1-3
9/10 Presentations and Discussions: 4-6; Introduction to Music management
9/17 Presentations and Discussions: 7-9
9/24 Presentations and Discussions: 10-12; Publishing and Copyright
10/1 Presentations and Discussions: 13-15
10/8 Presentations and Discussions: 16-18; Recording and Broadcast Industry
10/15 Presentations and Discussions: 19-21
10/22 Presentations and Discussions: 22-24; Contracts and Legal Issues
10/29 Research and Study
11/5 Senior Comprehensive Exam I - Listening and Score Identification
11/12 Research and Study
11/19 Senior Comprehensive Exam II - Essays on Specific Areas
11/26 Thanksgiving: Research and Turkey
12/3 Senior Comprehensive Exam III - Analysis of Selected Works

ASSIGNED TOPICS FOR MUSIC MANAGEMENT:

Music Management study materials should be drawn from the four required MuMG courses: Introduction to Music Business: an Overview, The Recording and Broadcast Industries, Music Publishing and the Copyright Law, and Contracts and Legal Issues for the Music Business. Questions will be drawn from subject matter covered in these classes and will be presented as a series of business tasks.

Music Management Materials:

Introduction to Music Management

Publishing and Copyright Law

Recording and Broadcast Industry

Contracts and Legal Issues

Site accessed Hit Counter times since 4/21/2008


All course materials are available on line on reserve. Through the semester, students will build the site by adding bibliographies, presentation outlines and PowerPoint presentations to this Manhattanville Blackboard Site and each student will be responsible for presenting one piece to the seminar. You should study the historical, theoretical and bibliographical information about these works.  This includes putting each work into the context of other pieces of the same genre or era, and you will be responsible for identifying works by listening and by looking at a score.

The Examinations will take place on three Wednesdays as indicated on the syllabus above. Also, each student will be responsible for the bibliography for their piece on the list. This word processed bibliography will be posted on line and should include the major books and articles dealing with each work, including encyclopedia articles in The New Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians and any scores or recordings used to prepare for the examination.  The list of sources indicates the level of preparation for the examination and should include journal articles relevant to each work.  The bibliography must follow a standard music format.


The guide for correct bibliography is: Mark A. Radice. Irvine's Writing About Music. (Portland, OR, 1999). All bibliography must conform to the guidelines in the text.

Useful Online Bibliography Reference: Towson University has an online guide in the style of Irvine's Writing about Music, which can be accessed here.

Learning Objectives: MUH 3997: Music Senior Seminar explores the historical repertoire of art music of Europe and the United States and reviews the basic constructs and principles of Music Management. This capstone course will bring into play the following Music Department Learning Objectives:

Objective II: Critical Thinking and Aural Analysis

Objective III: Breadth of Knowledge

Objective IV: Information Retrieval and Literacy

Objective V: Analytic and Research Writing Skills


 Rubric for Grading a Presentation in Senior Seminar

*Adapted from models at Utah Education Network

 

Unsatisfactory - D

Satisfactory - C

Good - B

Excellent - A

Grading

Subject Knowledge

Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.

Some subject knowledge is evident. Some Information is confusing or incorrect.

Subject knowledge is evident. Most information is clear, appropriate, and correct.

Subject knowledge is evident and thorough. All information is clear, correct, and appropriate.

/32

Citing Sources

No sources are properly cited.

Few sources are properly cited.

All sources are well chosen and properly cited.

Excellent sources are well chosen and properly cited.

/24

Organization

The sequence of information is not logical. Reference to further information is not evident.

The sequence of information is somewhat logical. Minimal further information is available.

The sequence of information is clear. Meaningful further research is referenced.

All presented information is logical and intuitive. Suggestions of further research are clear and direct.

/24

Originality

The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is no evidence of new thought.

The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is little evidence of new thought or inventiveness.

The presentation shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness.

Most content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, and inventive.

/10

Technical

PowerPoint runs adequately and spoken text is coordinated.

PowerPoint runs well and spoken text adds additional detail to slides.

PowerPoint runs well and both spoken text and handout add significant detail.

PowerPoint, spoken text and handout are well coordinated and contain rich details.

/10

Evaluation:            /100