MANHATTANVILLE COLLEGE
Dr. Kathy Rockwood
(914) 323-3149
E-mail: rockwoodk@mville.edu
EDAD 5002 Teacher Leader within the Learning Organization
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course introduces the basic vision of the Educational Leadership program: to develop in participants the ability to view schools and school districts as systems that have the capacity to become Learning Organizations. Specific emphasis is placed on leadership self-assessment, means to develop and support productive teams, practical application in facilitating effective meetings, and the ability to solve problems and effectively navigate diverse teacher leader roles and responsibilities in school improvement work.
REQUIRED TEXT(S)
Donaldson, G. A., Jr. (2006). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people purpose, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. [selected chapters]
Eaker, R., DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2002). Getting started: Reculturing schools to become learning organizations. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Currency Doubleday. [selected chapters]
Other assigned case studies and articles.
SUPPLEMENTAL OR RECOMMENDED TEXT(S)
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D.C. Author. [summary guidelines will be posted on Blackboard site]
Moller, G. & Pankake, A. (2006). Lead with me: A principal’s guide to teacher leadership. Poughkeepski, NY: Eye on Education.
Fullan, M. 2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publications.
Harvey, T., & Drolet, B. (2004). Building teams, building people: Expanding the fifth resource. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishing Group. [Excerpted reading will be digitized and posted on Blackboard]
Senge, P. et al. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, Parents and everyone who cares about education. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Zepeda, S. J., Mayers, S. R., & Benson, B. N. (2003). The call to teacher leadership. Poughkeepski, NY: Eye on Education.
SUMMARY OF COURSE INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS & ASSESSMENT
(This table corresponds with the “Attachment” section, where specific detail of assignments and performance assessments are addressed.)
SUMMARY OF COURSE INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS & ASSESSMENT
|
Objectives (Standard #s that apply): |
Learning Activities/Assignment |
Performance Assessment |
|
1.
Candidates will demonstrate that they have an integrated understanding of
three frameworks of a
learning organization, as represented by Senge’s five disciplines,
DuFour’s emphasis on student learning, and Gordon’s three streams of
leadership (ELCC 1.1 a,b, 1.2a, 6.1) |
-Class
discussion -Vision
statement -Case
studies |
-Rubric
for effective participation in collegial discussions -Rubric
for written submissions -
Written Case Study Response rubric |
|
2.
Candidates will apply the implications of Senge’s five disciplines to an
analysis of public and non-public schools [ELCC 1.3, 1.5, 2.4,
3.2, 6.2 ; NY
Standards (a), (b), (c), (g), (i) ] |
-Application
to school/work environment through discussion, written assignments, case study, and field work |
-Rubric
for effective participation in collegial discussions -Rubric
for written submissions -
Team Case Study Rubric |
|
3.
Candidates will conduct an analysis of an educational institution with
which they are very familiar and use the concepts examined in the course,
identify a problem, and then propose a systems approach to solving it. [ELCC
1.4,1.5, 2.3, 2.4, 4.1, 6.1, 6.2 ; NY Standards (a), (b), (c), (g), (i) ] |
-Poster
or visual to capture problem resolution (in class) |
-Poster
guidelines |
|
4.
Candidates will analyze a case and support their analysis with reference
to readings and the appropriate use of APA style. [ELCC 6.1]
|
-Indiv.
& team case study analysis -APA
guidelines |
-Written
Case Study Response Rubric |
|
5.
Candidates will demonstrate personal insight and understanding of the
teacher leader’s multi-faceted roles in developing and supporting teams
within a learning organization. [ELCC,
1.1, 1.2., 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 2.1, 5.1, 5.2] |
-Class
discussion of readings & field-related cases -Class
exercises -Case
study -Self-assessment
instruments |
-Rubric
for effective participation in collegial discussions -Personal
Leadership Essay rubric |
|
6.
Candidates will assess their leadership style in working with others
within their organizations. (ELCC 2.4c) |
-Self-assessment
instruments -Class
exercises |
Personal
Leadership Essay rubric |
COURSE ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS:
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
· Assessment of School Culture (based on DuFour checklist). A worksheet will be provided in class to support this assessment in class.
· Write a 1-2 page personal vision statement about your role as a Teacher Leader.
· Prepare a 1 page “right column/left column conversation” that highlights dual conversations that go on in your head versus what you actually express.
· Create a Problem-Resolution Poster that captures understanding of a problem within the framework of systems thinking. This will be done in class.
ü summary of the key issue(s)
ü an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the key players and overall situation
ü a personal reaction or point of view
ü proposal(s) for more effective resolutions
The analysis should include appropriate references from your readings and a bibliography. (Use APA format) (20%)
EVALUATION/GRADING
Grading in this course will be guided by active participation in the Institute activities and team work, online exchange with members of the leadership cohort, ongoing reflection and ability to synthesize the institute learning experiences. Rubrics and protocols will establish the expectations for each assignment. Students will be given an opportunity to revise assignments that are below expectations. For each assignment students will be asked to complete a self-assessment. Anything below a B is not acceptable for graduate work. The grading scale is as follows:

Late Assignments: Due dates for various assignments are indicated in the course outline. Assignments which are turned in late will lose credit at the rate of one point value for each day past the due date.
Academic Honesty (excerpt from School of Education catalog):
All forms of academic dishonesty, unfair advantage, and plagiarism will have consequences, from failure of the assignment or failure of the course, up to and including expulsion from the School of Education. In all cases where academic dishonesty is suspected, both faculty members and students have the obligation to bring the matter to the attention of the Associate Dean for Graduate Advising.